NEWSPAPERS IN THE 1960s
Struggle and Decline
The decade of the 1960s was one of continued struggle and decline for newspapers. In 1909 there were 689 cities in the United States that had competing daily newspapers; by 1963 that number had shrunk to 55. Among major cities that number was down to 20. Over 1,400 cities had only one newspaper or two papers owned by the same publisher. Chains such as Scripps-Howard, Hearst, Newhouse, Knight, and Cox bought up papers around the country, having the effect of making newspapers more alike editorially regardless of the competitive status. Also people began to move outside the cities to the suburbs, taking away circulation and targets of advertisers.
Competition
Newspapers in the 1950s and 1960s performed three functions for the public: they provided news information, they provided entertainment, and they were advertising vehicles. The decline of a competitive news environment was a product of the rise of television journalism, as network and local-affiliate news became the new competitive forces. Television obviously provided an entertainment medium more conducive to the general public. As an outlet for advertisers, the new vitality of radio along with television took away many of the advertisers the newspapers relied upon. In 1950 local radio had advertising revenues of $273 million; in 1965 this figure had increased to $889 million. Television ad receipts increased from $171 million in 1950 to $2.5 billion in 1965. Newspaper ads increased from $2.1 billion
to $4.4 billion. But this revenue was spread among 1,751 daily papers and 562 Sunday papers as against only 604 television stations.
Paring Down
Cities were increasingly left with one newspaper because that was all that the city could support economically. Cities such as New York saw the number of daily newspapers drop because the major advertisers—such as Macy's or Bloomingdale's—could no longer afford to buy huge advertising spreads in both The New York Times and the New York Herald Tribune, for example. New York papers were also faced with union troubles, some papers having to deal with as many as ten unions when renegotiating a contract. While other cities, such as Nashville, Miami, and Tucson, had competing papers functioning under joint operating agreement—in which they shared production facilities—New York unions threatened strikes to prevent the reduction in labor that would result from such a move.
New York
The practical costs of this operating environment showed up in the stories of failed papers across the country. The most famous, and possibly best, newspaper to fold was the New York Herald Tribune, which finally succumbed to a long illness on 24 August 1966. The New York Herald Tribune was founded as the New York Herald in 1835 and merged with the Horace Greeley-founded New York Tribune in 1924. During its prime, as Jimmy Breslin writes, "It was a fatter and far better-written paper than the [New York] Times." Its list of contributors included John O'Hara, Walter Kerr, Richard Harding Davis, Walter Lippmann, Red Smith, Art Buchwald, and Joseph Alsop.
Strikes
The decline of the paper was due to mismanagement after the death of owner-editor Ogden Reid in 1947. In an attempt to compete with television, the new owners, Reid's widow and two sons, adulterated the editorial program of the paper, at one time placing a gossip column on page 1. The cachet of the New York Herald Tribune slowly evaporated, and financial losses mounted. U.S. ambassador to Great Britain John Hay ("Jock") Whitney bought the paper in 1958 and slowly began to rebuild it, both its circulation and its editorial base. By 1962 circulation was up to 411,000 and gaining 1,000 per week. Then in 1962 the head of the printers' union called a strike that lasted 114 days; when it ended, circulation was crippled and annual losses ran to $5 million.
PANCAKE OR BAREFACED
The televised debates between Vice-president Richard Nixon and Senator John Kennedy in 1960 changed forever the form and content of national elections in the United States. For the first time a candidate's attractiveness on television was the ammunition for a political attack. Nixon's poor makeup—an aide plastered his face to cover up his naturally heavy beard—made him appear washed out compared to the youthful, tan-faced Kennedy. Many commentators have claimed that Nixon lost the election because of his appearance. Indeed, Kennedy used the vice-president's appearance as campaign fodder throughout the rest of the election.
At a campaign stop in New Mexico, Kennedy responded to Nixon's claims that the senator was a barefaced liar:
Two days ago, the Republican candidate, Mr. Nixon, quoted me as having said that the Republicans had always opposed Social Security, and in that wonderful choice of words which distinguishes him as a national leader, he asserted that this was a barefaced lie. Having seen him four times close up in this campaign, and made-up, I would not accuse Mr. Nixon of being barefaced—but I think the American people next Tuesday can determine who is telling the truth.
Source:
Joseph P. Berry, John F. Kennedy and the Media: The First Television President (Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1987),
pp. 125-126.
WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE?
In August 1962 the Soviet Union purchased advertising space in three American and four foreign newspapers to reprint Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev's speech to the Soviet Peace Congress. For $32,500 the Soviets had the speech printed in the New York Herald Tribune, the Kansas City Star, the San Francisco News-Call Bulletin, the Montreal (Canada) Star, the Ottawa (Canada) Journal, the Winnipeg (Canada) Free Press, and the Manchester(England) Guardian.
The Washington Post was also approached to run the text of the speech. The Post instead offered to run the speech in its news columns at no cost if a Soviet newspaper would agree to run President John F. Kennedy's speech on disarmament given that month to the United Nations General Assembly. The Soviets never replied to the offer by the Post.
Merger
In April 1966 the New York Herald Tribune was merged with two troubled afternoon dailies, the New York World-Telegram & Sun (itself a merged paper) and the New York Journal-American. On 24 April 1966 another strike started and lasted 113 days; the New York
Herald Tribune was never again published. The paper that did remain, called the New York World-Journal-Tribune, lasted only until 1967. There were scattered successes among the failures. New York Newsday, founded in 1940 and actually published on Long Island to serve the suburban community, took much of the circulation and advertising revenue from the city dailies.
Lower Quality
Competition among the newspapers and with television and radio had the effect of lowering the quality of the major papers. Many executives believed that a national paper might succeed where a large city daily did not. The New York Times began a national edition, and the Wall Street Journal became a national business paper by establishing printing and distribution centers in eight locations across the country. The publisher of the Wall Street Journal, Dow-Jones, started the National Observer, a general-interest weekly paper, in 1962, but it failed to generate the huge circulation expected and was closed. It took until the 1980s and the Gannett group's USA Today to strike the right formula for a national general-interest paper.
Sources:
Ben H. Bagdikian, "The American Newspaper Is Neither Record,
Mirror, Journal, Ledger, Bulletin, Telegram, Examiner, Register,
Chronicle, Gazette, Observer, Monitor, Transcript nor Herald of
the Day's Events: It's Just Bad News," Esquire, 67 (March 1967):
124, 138;
"Big Newspapers Hit by Move from Cities to Suburbs," Business Week
(27 May 1961): 103-104, 109;
Jimmy Breslin, "A Struck Paper, Famous and Needed, Goes Down,"
Life, 61 (26 August 1966): 26-29;
Richard Kluger, The Paper: The Life and Death of the New York Herald
Tribune (New York: Knopf, 1986);
"Newspapers Fight a Dollar Deadline," Business Week (11 September
1965): 136, 138, 140, 143;
"A Wallflower at Five," Newsweek, 69 (27 February 1967): 54-55;
"What's Happening to Newspapers," U.S. News and World Report, 54
(28 January 1963): 81-82;
"When Unions Killed a Major Newspaper," U.S. News and World Re-port, 61 (29 August 1966): 70-72;
"Winds of Change for Newspapers," U. S. News and World Report, 60
(25 April 1966): 67-69.